Cosmology, Creation Claims, and Spiritual Authority

 Every explanation of the universe carries a claim about authority.

Every explanation of the universe eventually leads to a deeper question: Who—or what—has the authority to define reality, truth, morality, and human purpose?

Cosmology is not merely the study of stars, galaxies, and origins. Every cosmological framework also shapes human ideas about truth, morality, responsibility, and spiritual authority. This article examines how the origin story people accept shapes the kind of life, society, and moral order they build.

Human beings have always sought to understand the origin of the universe.

From ancient creation accounts to modern cosmological theories, every generation has tried to explain where existence came from, why reality operates in an ordered way, and what place humanity holds within the greater whole.

These questions are not merely scientific. They are philosophical, moral, and spiritual.

A cosmology is never just a map of galaxies. It is also a framework of meaning. It influences how people understand life, responsibility, justice, human dignity, death, and the possibility of truth itself.

Behind every cosmology stands a deeper question:

Who—or what—holds ultimate authority over reality?

Is reality governed by blind accident? By impersonal energy? By endless change? By human interpretation? Or by an eternal source of order that stands above human preference and personal opinion?

➡ Internal Link: 

• Is Reality Within Truth, or Is Truth Within Reality?

---

Cosmology and Human Meaning

Different civilizations have proposed different explanations for existence.

Some have taught divine creation. Others have imagined an eternal universe. Some propose cosmic consciousness, materialistic origins, cyclical worlds, or an evolving universe without a final purpose.

Each framework produces consequences.

If the universe is ultimately accidental, then human life may appear accidental as well. Moral principles may then be treated as temporary agreements, useful only when convenient.

If reality arises from purposeful order, however, then truth, justice, responsibility, and human dignity may be understood as part of that order rather than inventions of society.

This does not mean every person who believes in creation lives morally, nor that every person with a material worldview lives without virtue. Human beings can recognize moral truth even while holding incomplete explanations of reality.

Yet the foundation matters.

A civilization cannot indefinitely preserve moral order while denying that moral order has a real foundation beyond human preference.

The Link Between Cosmology and Moral Order

Cosmology shapes moral thinking because it shapes the meaning of human existence.

Consider the difference between these two views:

• Human beings are the accidental product of blind forces.
• Human beings exist within an ordered reality and are accountable to its moral structure.

The first view can still produce laws, customs, and ethics. But those laws finally rest on human agreement. What one generation establishes, another may discard.

The second view recognizes that moral law is not created by majority vote. Truth remains true whether people accept it or reject it. Love remains better than hatred. Justice remains better than oppression. Life remains better than destruction.

This is why cosmology cannot be separated from moral authority.

When a society loses confidence that truth and morality are rooted in reality, it often replaces them with power, preference, ideology, or public pressure.

The result is confusion.

Creation and the Question of Authority

To speak of creation is to raise the question of a source.

If the universe has an origin, then it is reasonable to ask whether that origin is merely mechanical, impersonal, intelligent, moral, or purposeful. These questions cannot be ignored simply because they are difficult.

A physical explanation of how matter develops does not automatically answer why truth matters, why conscience exists, why cruelty is wrong, or why human beings recognize justice as more than personal taste.

Science can examine processes within the universe. It can measure motion, energy, matter, time, and biological development. These are valuable and necessary tasks.

But science alone cannot declare what a human life is worth, why betrayal is wrong, or why love should prevail over hatred. Those are questions of moral and spiritual authority.

The mistake is not in studying the physical universe. The mistake is in assuming that physical explanation alone can replace every other kind of truth.

Competing Claims of Spiritual Authority

Many systems claim to explain the ultimate source of reality.

Some appeal to sacred texts. Some appeal to mystical experience. Some appeal to reason alone. Some appeal to supposedly advanced beings, hidden knowledge, ancient teachers, modern prophets, or human consciousness.

Every such claim should be examined carefully.

A claim to spiritual authority does not become true merely because it is ancient, emotionally powerful, widely accepted, scientifically worded, or delivered with confidence.

The proper questions remain:

• Is the explanation coherent?
• Does it contradict observable reality?
• Does it preserve the distinction between truth and falsehood?
• Does it produce consistent moral principles?
• Does it honor human dignity and responsibility?
• Does it clarify reality or create dependency and confusion?
• Does it lead toward life, wisdom, and constructive order?

A worldview that cannot answer these questions remains incomplete, however impressive its language may sound.

The Seven Pillars as a Measuring Instrument

The Doctrine of the Seven Pillars of the Eternal Source provides a stable framework for examining cosmological and spiritual claims.

The pillars are:

1. Truth — Does the claim welcome honest examination, evidence, correction, and clarity?
2. Light — Does it increase understanding or deepen confusion?
3. Love — Does it protect dignity, compassion, justice, and human wellbeing?
4. Power — Does it strengthen moral responsibility or create fear and dependency?
5. Creation — Does it support constructive life, order, and renewal?
6. Wisdom — Does it produce sound judgment, restraint, and discernment?
7. Life — Does it lead toward moral, spiritual, and human flourishing?

A cosmology should not be accepted only because it explains the heavens. It must also be tested by what it teaches about life on Earth.

A theory that describes distant stars but cannot account for moral responsibility is only a partial explanation.

A spiritual system that claims cosmic knowledge but produces fear, confusion, pride, or moral disorder must also be questioned.

Truth does not fear examination.

The Search for a Stable Framework

A stable worldview requires more than speculation.

It must align with observable reality, rational thought, moral experience, and the enduring need for justice, love, wisdom, and life.

Humanity needs a framework strong enough to resist deception, ideology, emotional manipulation, and the temptation to make personal desire the final authority.

When cosmology is separated from moral truth, confusion easily follows.

When moral truth is separated from reality, morality becomes merely a preference.

When authority is separated from truth, power becomes abusive.

But when cosmology, morality, and spiritual authority are properly aligned, human beings gain a clearer understanding of both the universe above them and the responsibilities placed before them.

➡ Internal Link: The Seven Pillars Knowledge Pyramid

---

Q&A Section

Q: Why does cosmology matter for everyday life?

Because a person’s view of the universe affects how he understands meaning, responsibility, morality, human dignity, and the purpose of life.

Q: Is cosmology only about science?

No. Science studies physical processes within the universe, while cosmology also raises philosophical questions about origin, meaning, order, and ultimate authority.

Q: Can science determine moral truth?

Science can describe facts and processes, but it cannot by itself determine why justice is better than oppression, why love is better than hatred, or why human life has moral value.

Q: Does belief in creation automatically make a person moral?

No. A person may profess belief in creation while living contrary to moral truth. The claim must be reflected in honesty, responsibility, justice, wisdom, and love.

Q: What makes a cosmology credible?

A credible cosmology should be coherent, open to honest examination, consistent with reality, morally constructive, and able to account for both physical existence and human responsibility.

Q: Why should spiritual authority be examined?

False spiritual authority can mislead people, weaken moral judgment, create dependency, and replace truth with unverified claims.

Q: How do the Seven Pillars help evaluate cosmological claims?

They provide a moral and rational measure. A claim should be examined according to whether it advances truth, light, love, power, creation, wisdom, and life.

---

Conclusion

Cosmology is more than an explanation of the universe.

It is also a statement about authority—about what governs reality, what grounds moral order, and what guides human understanding.

Every worldview eventually must answer whether truth is real, whether morality is more than opinion, and whether human beings are accountable to an order greater than themselves.

A true cosmology must do more than describe stars, matter, energy, and time. It must also illuminate the moral structure that sustains human life.

The universe may be vast beyond measure, but the central question remains close to every human heart:

What is reality grounded upon, and who has the authority to define what is true, good, and right?

Signature Closing Paragraph

The search for the origin of the universe must not end in speculation alone. It must lead toward clearer truth, stronger moral responsibility, wiser judgment, and a life that reflects the enduring order of reality. The heavens may reveal vastness, but moral order reveals direction.

➡ Internal Link: 

• Moral Order as Civilizational Infrastructure

Call to Action

Explore the Seven Pillars Series at Rayos ng Liwanag and examine how truth, moral order, and spiritual authority shape the future of human life.

Related Articles

• The Seven Pillars and the Great Order of Reality
• The Seven Pillars Knowledge Pyramid
• Moral Order as Civilizational Infrastructure
• The Law of Reality: Why Consequences Cannot Be Escaped
• Is Reality Within Truth, or Is Truth Within Reality?
• When One Idea Explains Everything

Blogger Labels / SEO Tags

cosmology philosophy, creation and authority, origin of the universe, moral order, spiritual authority, worldview foundations, Seven Pillars doctrine, Rayos ng Liwanag

Hashtags

#Cosmology
#Creation
#SpiritualAuthority
#OriginOfReality
#MoralOrder
#SevenPillars
#Truth
#PhilosophyOfReality
#RayosNgLiwanag

The Fulfillment Problem: If the Nokodemion Teaching Was Lost, What Becomes of the Messianic Witness?

A claim of ancient distortion cannot erase the prophetic record without leaving a recoverable original fingerprint.

If the Nokodemion teaching was supposedly distorted, forgotten, replaced, and hidden across centuries, one question cannot be avoided: what becomes of the Hebrew Scriptures and their messianic witness later connected to Jmmanuel?

Were those fulfillments genuine? Were they sincere interpretations? Were they later theological constructions? Or were they deliberate fraud?

The answer must not be forced. But neither can the question be escaped.

This article examines the serious historical problem created by the claim that Jmmanuel’s original teaching belonged to a lost Nokodemion tradition later replaced by religious distortion. It asks whether such a claim can overturn the messianic witness of the Hebrew Scriptures without providing a traceable original teaching, an independent manuscript chain, or recognizable historical fingerprints.

The issue is not whether ancient traditions can be misunderstood. They can. The issue is whether a later restoration claim can simply dismiss the surviving witnesses as corrupted while offering no recoverable evidence of what allegedly existed before them.

It must show more than dissatisfaction with the surviving record. It must provide a credible reason to believe that another message existed before that record, and it must leave some identifiable trace of that earlier message.

This is where the Nokodemion claim faces a serious problem.

The Hebrew Scriptures contain a long and recognizable world: covenant, obedience, righteousness, judgment, repentance, prayer, mercy, kingship, restoration, and hope. Within that world, the writings later connected to Jmmanuel present him as deeply rooted in Israel’s story.

Matthew repeatedly connects Jmmanuel’s life and mission to the Hebrew Scriptures. John presents him within the same world of Israel, the prophets, the Law, the promises, and the Eternal Source.

The Nokodemion framework, however, introduces a different foundation: a teaching allegedly connected to a much larger cosmology of Creational law, reincarnation, extraterrestrial contact, and a concealed ancient lineage.

The question is not whether such a framework is interesting.

The question is whether it has a historical fingerprint.

Read also: The Missing Fingerprint Problem 

Tagalog version is available: Ang Suliranin ng Katuparan: Kung Nawala ang Aral ni Nokodemion, Ano ang Nangyayari sa Mesyanikong Patotoo?

The Jmmanuel Fingerprint Test: History, Nokodemion, and the Burden of Evidence

 A claimed ancient teaching must leave an ancient trail

A teaching may sound ancient. It may use sacred names, speak of forgotten ages, and claim a hidden lineage stretching across millennia. Yet no claim becomes historical merely because it is repeated with confidence.

The decisive question is simple:

Where is the fingerprint that history should have preserved?

This article applies a historical fingerprint test to the claimed Nokodemion–Jmmanuel lineage. It examines manuscript continuity, historical setting, conceptual consistency, independent corroboration, and the burden of evidence required for extraordinary claims.

The search for truth requires more than loyalty to a source, fascination with mystery, or trust in a confident messenger. It requires a standard that can distinguish between a genuine inheritance and a later reconstruction.

A historical claim must be measured by what it leaves behind.

This is especially important when a modern teaching claims to represent an ancient hidden lineage: a line of instruction preserved through forgotten prophets, concealed manuscripts, cosmic teachers, or secret custodians. Such a claim may be possible in theory. But possibility is not proof.

The central issue is not whether a person is sincere. The issue is whether the claim can survive historical examination.

This article continues the principles explored in: The Missing Fingerprint Problem and: The Long-Gap Transmission Problem 

Tagalog version is available: Ang Pagsusuri sa Bakas ni Jmmanuel: Kasaysayan, Nokodemion, at ang Bigat ng Ebidensiya

TESTIMONY, EVIDENCE, AND THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH

 Why sincere reports must be measured against th.e fingerprints of reality

A testimony may be sincere, moving, detailed, and even repeated for many years. Yet sincerity alone does not establish that an event happened exactly as reported. Truth requires more than confidence. It requires a willingness to place every claim beneath the measure of reality.

An examination of what testimony can establish, what evidence can confirm, and how the Seven Pillars protect the search for truth from both gullibility and cynicism.

Human life depends heavily on testimony.

We learn history through witnesses and records. We trust medical reports, family accounts, court proceedings, news reports, researchers, teachers, and people who claim to have seen or experienced something unusual. Testimony is not worthless. Without it, much of human knowledge would disappear.

Yet testimony is not self-verifying.

A person may be honest and still mistaken. A memory may be vivid and still incomplete. A witness may be confident and still influenced by expectation, fear, loyalty, ideology, misunderstanding, or the passage of time.

For this reason, truth cannot rest merely on how passionately something is stated, how many people repeat it, or how deeply it affects the emotions.

At the same time, it is equally foolish to dismiss every testimony simply because it cannot immediately be proven. A mature search for truth refuses both extremes: blind acceptance and automatic rejection.

The proper question is not merely, “Do I believe this person?”

The better question is:

What does reality preserve, reveal, confirm, or contradict concerning this claim?

The Seven Pillars Alignment Test

Billy Meier’s 21 Quotes Measured by the Seven Pillars of the Eternal Source

 Good words must still be measured by the structure of truth.

A moral quote may sound wise, humane, and practical. But the real question is not whether it sounds good. The real question is whether it remains aligned with Truth, Light, Love, Power, Creation, Wisdom, and Life.

This article examines 21 quotes attributed to Billy Meier through the Doctrine of the Seven Pillars of the Eternal Source. The purpose is not to attack every sentence, nor to defend every claim, but to measure each statement according to truth, love, wisdom, justice, responsibility, and life.

Some statements show clear ethical value. Others require qualification. A few reveal deeper structural weakness, especially where human consciousness, personal opinion, or individual autonomy appears to become the final authority.

➡ The Alignment Test: Measuring Order and Collapse

Every serious claim must be measured. Not by popularity. Not by fascination. Not by the teacher's personality. Not even by the beauty of the words.

It must be measured by reality.

This examination examines 21 quotes attributed to Billy Meier and tests them against the Doctrine of the Seven Pillars of the Eternal Source: Truth, Light, Love, Power, Creation, Wisdom, and Life.

For readers who are new to this framework, begin with this foundational article:
The Seven Pillars Knowledge Pyramid.

This is important because a quote may contain partial wisdom while still failing as a complete foundation. A teacher may say many useful things and still build a larger worldview on unstable ground.

Therefore, this article asks plainly:

Do these 21 quotes merely contain good ethical advice, or do they reveal a complete alignment with the Seven Pillars?

For direct comparison and easy verification, readers may consult the original 21 quotes of Billy Meier here: ➡ 21 Quotes of Billy Meier About Living Life

__________________________________________________________________

The Reincarnation Question in Contact Report 933 What the Nokodemion Teaching Actually Says About Rebirth, Personality, and Creation-Life-Energy

 A careful examination of Contact Report 933 reveals that the Nokodemion Teaching does not teach traditional reincarnation, but something fundamentally different.

Many people assume that the Nokodemion Teaching supports the traditional idea of reincarnation.

However, Contact Report 933 repeatedly states that no human personality is ever reborn.

If that is true, what exactly continues after death?

A structural examination of Contact Report 933 reveals why the Nokodemion Teaching rejects traditional reincarnation and instead teaches the continuity of Creation-life-energy.

One of the most misunderstood subjects within FIGU discussions is reincarnation.

Many people who encounter the Nokodemion Teaching naturally interpret it through concepts inherited from Spiritism, Theosophy, New Age teachings, Eastern religions, or popular Western beliefs about past lives.

As a result, it is often assumed that Contact Report 933 teaches that a person dies and later returns as another person.

Yet a careful reading of the report reveals a far more nuanced position.

The distinction is important because the framework presented in Contact Report 933 differs significantly from traditional concepts of reincarnation.

This article examines what the report actually teaches and explores the major philosophical questions that emerge from its explanation.

Tagalog version is available: 

Contact Report 933 Under Examination: The Fingerprints of History, the Rise of AI, and the Fate of the Final Herald

 When Extraordinary Claims Meet the Fingerprints of Reality

This investigation examines the major claims of Contact Report 933 through the lenses of evidence, historical continuity, artificial intelligence, and the preservation of knowledge. Rather than defending or attacking the report, it applies a reality-based approach grounded in observable fingerprints, measurable outcomes, and independent verification. 

For easy verification and direct comparison, readers may consult the original Contact Report 933 here: Billy Meier Contact Report 933 

This examination encourages readers to check the source directly and measure its claims carefully against evidence, structure, and the Seven Pillars standard.

Chapter 1

Why This Investigation Matters

For decades, Billy Meier's Contact Reports have attracted the attention of people seeking answers about the origin of humanity, the history of the world, the future of civilization, and even the dangers that may confront humankind.

However, whenever a teaching makes extraordinary claims about both the past and the future, a simple question cannot be avoided:

How do we know whether a claim is truly aligned with reality?

The sincerity of a teacher is not enough.

The length of time spent teaching is not enough.

The number of followers is not enough.

In the end, reality itself serves as the measure.

---

The Purpose of This Investigation

It is important to make something clear from the beginning:

This book was not written to discredit Billy Meier.

Neither was it written to defend him.

Rather, it is an attempt to examine some of the most significant claims found in Contact Report 933 in the light of:

• history,
• evidence,
• logic,
• and the long-term outcomes associated with these claims.

The goal is not to win a debate.

The goal is to understand.

The Doctrine of the Seven Pillars of the Eternal Source

Truth, Light, Love, Power, Creation, Wisdom, and Life: the straight path toward Great Order and Perfect Balance.

What if the deepest truth is not proven by how old a teaching is, but by whether it produces truth, light, love, order, wisdom, and life?

An introduction to the Doctrine of the Seven Pillars of the Eternal Source: Truth, Light, Love, Power, Creation, Wisdom, and Life.

Humanity has inherited many religions, philosophies, traditions, and systems of thought. Some claim authority because they are ancient. Others claim authority because they are popular. Still others claim authority because they promise knowledge, power, comfort, or salvation.

Yet age, popularity, and confidence do not automatically establish truth.

The Doctrine of the Seven Pillars of the Eternal Source begins with a different question:

What principles must be present wherever reality, moral order, and life are truly preserved?

Its answer is found in seven inseparable pillars:

Truth, Light, Love, Power, Creation, Wisdom, and Life.

This doctrine does not depend on a claim that an ancient civilization preserved its exact language, title, or framework. It does not need to borrow authority from a hidden manuscript, an exclusive institution, or a human founder.

Instead, it presents the Seven Pillars as eternal realities that must be measured by their consequences.

The present formulation may be new, but its claim is not that truth itself began now. Its claim is that human beings must once again measure every teaching, system, institution, and personal decision against the realities that sustain Great Order and Perfect Balance.

Internal link: The Seven Pillars Alignment Test

Tagalog version is available: Ang Doktrina ng Pitong Haligi ng Walang Hanggang Bukal 

---

The Eternal Source: The Origin of All Order

The Eternal Source refers to the ultimate origin of all that exists. In a religious understanding, the Eternal Source may be called God. In the language of this doctrine, He is the ground of being, the origin of life, and the source from which all true order proceeds.

The Eternal Source is not presented as a possession of one religion, culture, organization, or personality. No person can own Him. No institution can contain Him.

From the Eternal Source flow the Seven Pillars. They are not decorative ideals. They are the moral and spiritual architecture by which human life can be measured.

Truth, Reality, and Logic: The Necessary Order of Sound Judgment

 Truth tells what is. Reality reveals what remains. Logic tests whether our conclusions truly follow.

Every claim asks to be believed. But before belief is given, three questions must be asked: Is it true? Does it stand in reality? Does the conclusion actually follow from the evidence?

Truth, reality, and logic are not competing standards. They work together to protect the human mind from deception, confusion, manipulation, and sincere error. Truth concerns whether a claim corresponds with what actually is. Reality reveals the condition, evidence, consequences, and enduring results of a claim. Logic examines whether the conclusion follows honestly from the facts.

When these three are separated, people can become confident without being correct. But when they are brought together, judgment becomes clearer, humbler, and more responsible.

Human beings are constantly surrounded by claims. A teacher makes a claim. A religious movement makes a claim. A politician makes a claim. A scientist, philosopher, influencer, friend, or family member makes a claim. Even our own emotions and memories make claims upon our judgment.

The danger is not merely that people may lie. The greater danger is that people can be sincere, persuasive, intelligent, and still be wrong.

A statement may sound noble, but fail in reality. An argument may be logically arranged but begin with a false premise. A personal experience may be genuine while the interpretation of that experience remains mistaken.

For this reason, sound judgment requires more than belief, emotion, tradition, popularity, or intellectual confidence. It requires the disciplined union of truth, reality, and logic.

Proverbs warns that the prudent person carefully considers his path. It also reminds us that the first account may appear convincing until it is examined. This is not an invitation to cynicism. It is a call to responsible discernment.

[Insert internal link: “Is Reality Within Truth, or Is Truth Within Reality?"

___________________________________________________________________________________

What Is Discernment? The First Line Between Truth and Deception

 Discernment is not about what feels right—it is about recognizing what remains true when everything is tested.

Not everything that sounds wise is true.

Not everything that feels right leads to life.
Discernment is what separates clarity from confusion—and survival from collapse.

This article establishes the true meaning of discernment—not as opinion, feeling, or preference, but as the ability to test, measure, and recognize truth against a fixed standard. It serves as the foundation of the Discernment Series.

Discernment is one of the most misunderstood concepts in modern thinking.

Many treat it as:

• personal opinion
• emotional intuition
• or intellectual preference

But that is not how things have ever worked where truth is preserved.

Discernment is not about what you like.
It is not about what you feel.

Discernment is about what is true—whether you like it or not.

➡ See foundation:
Seven Pillars Knowledge Pyramid

The Final Measure

 When every claim has spoken, reality gives the verdict.

A claim does not become true because it is ancient, popular, emotionally powerful, protected by an institution, or spoken by a confident messenger.

It must be measured.

Not by blind loyalty. Not by fear of questioning. Not by fascination with the extraordinary.

But by what it produces when it meets reality.

“The Final Measure” presents the closing standard for examining any teaching, authority, prophecy, ideology, or extraordinary claim. It argues that truth must be demonstrated through reality, measurable consequence, and alignment with the Seven Pillars of the Eternal Source: Truth, Light, Love, Power, Creation, Wisdom, and Life.

Every serious claim eventually reaches the same unavoidable point: it must stand before reality.

A teaching may possess ancient texts, passionate defenders, impressive language, private revelations, respected leaders, or a large following. Yet none of these things proves that the teaching is true. History is full of systems that claimed wisdom while producing confusion, claimed peace while producing division, claimed freedom while creating dependence, and claimed enlightenment while hiding behind fear.

The question is not merely, “Who said it?”

The deeper question is: What kind of reality does it produce?

This is where examination becomes necessary. The measure of truth cannot be reduced to personality, popularity, institutional protection, or inherited tradition. A claim must be tested by whether it corresponds with reality and whether its fruit remains sound across time.

As Jesus taught: “You will know them by their fruits” (Matthew 7:16).

For a deeper foundation on why truth must remain anchored in reality, read:

The Law of Reality: Why Truth Must Be Fixed

If Truth Evolves, Who Determines When It Is Finally True?

 A changing truth requires a changing authority. A fixed reality requires a fixed standard.

If truth changes over time, then who decides when it has finally arrived?

And if no one can answer that question, can it truly be called truth at all?

One of the most important questions in philosophy, religion, and human development is rarely asked directly: if truth evolves, who determines when it becomes true? This article examines the implications of evolving truth and explores why every civilization ultimately requires a stable measure beyond opinion, authority, and changing interpretations.

Human beings naturally grow in knowledge.

Children become adults.

Students become teachers.

Civilizations advance through discovery.

The development of understanding is obvious.

But a very different question lies beneath this observation:

Does truth itself develop, or do human beings merely discover more of what is already true?

The distinction appears small at first.

In reality, it may be one of the most important distinctions ever made.

If truth itself evolves, then what is true today may not be true tomorrow.

If truth itself changes, then every belief system, every philosophy, every institution, and every moral framework becomes provisional.

Nothing remains final.

Nothing remains settled.

Nothing remains truly true.

Before asking whether truth evolves, we must first understand the nature of truth itself and why it serves as the first pillar of reality. (Read: The Pillar of Truth)

The difference between development and evolution becomes critical when discussing truth. (Read: Development vs Evolution: The Structural Divide)