Sunday, February 22, 2026

What Does “Christ” Really Mean in the Bible?

 

What Does “Christ” Really Mean in the Bible?



Hook Statement

Many people treat “Christ” as a name — but in Scripture it describes a role. Understanding that difference changes how we understand Jesus and his mission.


Short Description

Explore the biblical meaning of the title “Christ,” its original purpose, and how it explains the mission and life of Jesus of Nazareth.


Introduction

Many people treat the word Christ as if it were part of Jesus’ personal name.
In the Scriptures, however, it functions as a title.

Understanding that title is necessary before any discussion about who Jesus is can be meaningful. A misunderstanding of the word produces a misunderstanding of the person.

For the full definition of Jesus as the Christ, see: Christology of Jesus of Nazareth.

The question is therefore simple:
What did the word Christ originally mean?


The Hebrew Word Mashiach

The English word Christ comes from the Greek Christos.
The Greek word translates the Hebrew term Mashiach.

Mashiach means anointed one.

In the Hebrew Scriptures, anointing involved applying oil to a person as a visible sign that God had appointed him to a role. The act did not change the person’s nature; it identified his commission.

The anointing indicated:

  • selection by God
  • authorization for a task
  • responsibility to carry out a mission

The authority belonged to God.
The anointed person carried it.

Therefore the meaning of Christ begins with appointment, not identity of essence.


Who Were Called “Anointed”

The Hebrew Scriptures apply anointing to multiple kinds of servants. The title did not belong to only one category of person.

Kings

Kings were anointed to govern the people under God’s law.
Their authority depended on their faithfulness to God’s will.

Prophets

Prophets were set apart to speak God’s message.
They did not speak from themselves but conveyed what they received.

Judges and Chosen Servants

Certain leaders were raised for specific purposes — deliverance, guidance, or restoration — and were recognized as chosen instruments of God.

In every case, the pattern remains consistent:

The anointed person serves under God.
God does not serve under the anointed person.

Thus, the title describes function and relationship, not divinity.


What Anointing Does Not Mean

Because the term later became associated with developed theological systems, assumptions were attached to it that are not present in its original usage.

Within the scriptural framework, anointing does not mean:

  • The person becomes God,
  • the person possesses independent divine authority
  • The person cannot obey or disobey
  • the person is removed from human responsibility

Instead, anointing establishes accountability.
The one chosen must act faithfully because he acts on behalf of God.

The greater the commission, the greater the responsibility.

Understanding this prevents the title from being interpreted in ways unrelated to its original purpose.


Applying the Title to Jesus of Nazareth

When the title Christ is applied to Jesus, the meaning must remain consistent with its established scriptural usage.

The title identifies him as:

  • appointed by God
  • sent with purpose
  • authorized to carry out God’s will

His authority therefore reflects the One who appointed him.

The focus shifts from speculation about nature to recognition of mission.
The title explains why he teaches, acts, and calls others to live in a particular way.

Rather than redefining the word, the Scriptures apply the existing word to a specific person whose life embodies its meaning.


Why the Meaning Matters

If Christ is understood as a role of divine appointment, then his life becomes instructional.

His actions demonstrate how a servant of God lives.
His obedience shows what faithfulness looks like in practice.
His teaching calls others to the same alignment with God.

If the word is misunderstood, the practical purpose of his life becomes unclear.
But when understood in its original sense, the title connects identity and responsibility.

Christ is not merely identified — he is followed.


Q&A Portion

Q: Is “Christ” the last name of Jesus?
No. “Christ” is a title meaning the anointed one — a person appointed and empowered for a divine purpose.

Q: Does the title automatically mean divinity?
In biblical usage, it identifies a chosen and commissioned servant, not a separate deity.

Q: Why is understanding the title important?
Because the mission of Jesus is understood through what the anointing signifies — authority, responsibility, and obedience.

Q: Can someone believe in Jesus but misunderstand “Christ”?
Yes. Many focus on identity labels while overlooking the function the title describes.

Conclusion

The word Christ does not function as a surname.
It is a description of calling.

From the Hebrew Scriptures onward, the anointed one is a servant chosen by God and entrusted with a task. The title defines mission and authority within a relationship of obedience.

Understanding the title clarifies how Jesus is to be understood and why his life carries meaning for those who listen to his teaching.

This role is summarized in the central reference: Christology of Jesus of Nazareth.

Call to Action

Consider the difference between a name and a calling. Re-examine familiar terms and let their original meaning guide your understanding. Share this with someone studying the life and mission of Jesus.


SEO Tags

meaning of Christ, Christ title in the Bible, Jesus Christ meaning, anointed one in scripture, biblical titles of Jesus, mission of Jesus explained, identity of Christ, biblical theology Christology, historical meaning of Christ, understanding Jesus in the Bible


Hashtags

#MeaningOfChrist #JesusInScripture #BiblicalUnderstanding #Christology #AnointedOne #TeachingsOfJesus #BibleStudy #FaithLearning #SpiritualInsight #ScriptureTruth

Friday, February 20, 2026

Ang Kordero ay Hindi Bukal - Ang Espiritu ang Bukal

 

Ang Kordero ay Hindi ang Bukal — Ang Espiritu ang Bukal

Bakit Itinatanggi ng Apocalipsis 5:6 ang Pagpapadiyos sa Tao at ang Kapalit na Kosmikong Awtoridad

Ang Kordero ay hindi naupo sa Luklukan.
Ang Kordero ay tumindig sa ilalim nito.

MAIKLING PAGLALARAWAN

Nililinaw ng artikulong ito ang tunay na kahulugan ng “Kordero” sa Apocalipsis 5:6. Ipinapakita nito na ang lahat ng awtoridad na iniuugnay sa Kordero ay nagmumula sa Pitong Espiritu ng Dios na isinugo sa buong kalupaan. Ibinabalik nito ang wastong kaayusan: ang Espiritu ang awtoridad; ang Kordero ang sisidlan.

PANIMULA

Sa paglipas ng panahon, ang Kordero ay ginawang kapalit na diyos—tagapawalang-bisa ng batas at tagapag-neutralisa ng hatol. Ngunit hindi ito ang itinuturo ni Juan. Kapag binasa ang Apocalipsis 5:6 nang tapat, itinatama ng teksto mismo ang maling unawang ito.

ANO ANG TUNAY NA SINASABI NG APOCALIPSIS 5:6

Thursday, February 19, 2026

Dalawang Ebanghelyo, Dalawang Espiritu: Isa Patungo sa Buhay, Isa Patungo sa Panlilinlang

 

Dalawang Ebanghelyo, Dalawang Espiritu: Isa Patungo sa Buhay, Isa Patungo sa Panlilinlang


📌 PAGLALARAWAN / SUBTITLE

Isang dokumentadong pagbubunyag sa malinaw na pagkakaiba ng tunay na Ebanghelyo ni Jesu-Cristo laban sa mga malawakang pagbaluktot na dala ng ibang ebanghelyo ni Pablo—ipinapangaral man ito ng mga megachurch o maliliit na kongregasyon.


🎯 PANIMULANG PAHAYAG 

Hindi lahat ng nangangaral sa pangalan ni Jesus ay ipinangangaral ang Ebanghelyo ni Jesus. May dalawang magkaibang ebanghelyo sa ating panahon—at isa lamang sa kanila ang patungo sa buhay na walang hanggan.

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Neutral Awareness Under the Reign of the Seven Pillars

 

Neutral Awareness Under the Reign of the Seven Pillars

Why Clarity Must Serve Order, Not Replace It


Search Description

A clear explanation of neutral awareness as disciplined perception under the Seven Pillars—not moral suspension, but clarity that leads to responsibility.


Article Description

This article clarifies the true meaning of neutral awareness when governed by the Doctrine of the Seven Pillars of the Eternal Source. It exposes false neutrality that abandons moral judgment and presents neutral awareness as a disciplined state of perception that serves truth, order, and responsibility.


Hook Statement

Neutral awareness does not stand between good and evil—it stands still long enough to see clearly, then moves where order demands.

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Nagkatawang Tao ang Verbo


Sinabi nga sa Juan 1:1, na sa simula ay Siya ang Verbo, at ang Verbo ay sumasa Dios, at ang Verbo ay Dios. Iyan ay isang napakaliwanag na pahayag, dangan nga lamang ay hindi naging malinaw kung sino ang tinutukoy na "Siya" sa talata (Juan 1:1). Diyan ay hindi mahirap unawain na ang tinutukoy na panahon ay yaong "simula", at may tinutukoy na personalidad (Siya) na kumakatawan sa Verbo. Kasunod nito'y ipinahayag, na ang Verbo ay sumasa Dios, at ang Verbo ay Dios.

Sunday, February 15, 2026

The Historical Jesus vs Imaginary Jesus

 


"Discover the truth: Was Jesus a historical figure or a creation of imagination? Uncover the facts and challenge the myths!" "Separate fact from fiction! Reveal the real Jesus—history or myth? Read now!"


Paul's interpretation of Jesus's true nature is fundamentally misguided. It creates a profound chasm between his views and the essence of Jesus's teachings. This divergence distorts Christ's message and risks leading believers astray from his authentic path.

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Why Billy Meier’s Doctrine of Creation Denies the Doctrine of the Seven Pillars of the Eternal Source

 

Why Billy Meier’s Doctrine of Creation Denies the Doctrine of the Seven Pillars of the Eternal Source

A Structural, Moral, and Reality-Based Exposure

Not all deceptions deny truth openly.
Some deny it quietly—by removing judgment, dissolving law, and replacing the Eternal Source with a comforting idea.


🔹 DESCRIPTION

Billy Meier’s Doctrine of Creation presents itself as a higher cosmic understanding centered on peace, evolution, and universal consciousness. However, when examined through the Doctrine of the Seven Pillars of the Eternal Source—Truth, Light, Love, Power, Creation, Wisdom, and Life—it becomes evident that Meier’s system structurally denies absolute truth, divine law, and moral accountability. This article offers a clear, uncompromising analysis of where and why the denial occurs, and why the Seven Pillars must stand as the moral gravity of reality in our time.