What exactly is supposed to return in
reincarnation—the same person, the same consciousness, the same memories, or
only an impersonal spirit-form?
Contact Report 707 Part 2 does not say that
1,049 human lives are lived by one person. It speaks separately of spirit-forms
allegedly undergoing many reincarnations on Earth and of Creation allegedly
passing through 1,049 cosmic transformations.
Confusing these two claims changes the meaning
of the report.
Accepting either claim without evidence
changes information into belief.
English: You are
reading the English edition.
It concerns personal identity, death,
continuity, responsibility, memory, consciousness, and the meaning of human
life. When a teaching says that something returns repeatedly after death, the
first responsibility is to determine exactly what is said to return.
Contact Report 707 Part 2 claims that certain
early ancestors of the Plejaren allegedly settled on Earth millions of years
ago, died there, and left spirit-forms that continue to be reborn through many
reincarnations. These spirit-forms are said to “animate” later Earth humans
whose development the Plejaren seek to assist.
The same report separately teaches that higher
forms of Creation pass through 1,049 transformations as they develop
toward higher levels and eventual integration with the Absolute Absolutum.
These are not two descriptions of the same
process.
One concerns alleged successive human
embodiments of spirit-forms.
The other concerns alleged transformations of
Creation itself.
This distinction must be preserved before the
claims can be tested.
The translation also contains obvious
transcription problems and malformed terminology. Therefore, this examination
does not pretend that every English expression perfectly preserves the original
German meaning. It evaluates what the supplied translation actually says while
refusing to fill its gaps with unsupported assumptions.
I. The
Exact Reincarnation Claim in the Report
The relevant passage presents the following
sequence:
- Early ancestors connected with the Plejaren allegedly settled on
Earth millions of years ago.
- Those individuals eventually died.
- Their spirit-forms allegedly remained connected with Earth.
- Those spirit-forms are said to be reborn through many
reincarnations.
- They allegedly animate later Earth humans.
- The Plejaren supposedly seek to assist the development of those
humans.
This is the strongest formulation the supplied
passage directly supports.
The passage does not directly establish that
the ancient personalities return.
It speaks of the return or rebirth of spirit-forms.
That difference is decisive.
II. What
the Report Does Not Establish
The passage does not demonstrate that the
following return from one life to another:
- the same personality;
- the same personal consciousness;
- the same memories;
- the same character;
- the same name;
- the same body;
- the same human relationships;
- the same moral awareness;
- or the same recognised personal identity.
It also does not explain how a present Earth
human could be independently identified as carrying one of these alleged
ancestral spirit-forms.
No test is provided.
No memory criterion is provided.
No biological marker is provided.
No independently observable spiritual marker
is provided.
No record is provided by which one embodiment
could be connected with another.
Therefore, the report makes a claim of
continuity without giving the reader a public method for demonstrating that
continuity.
III.
Spirit-Form Continuity Is Not Automatically Personal Continuity
A human person is ordinarily recognised
through a connected identity involving consciousness, memory, agency,
relationships, history, responsibility, and self-awareness.
Suppose a spirit-form enters one human life
and later enters another, but:
- the second person remembers nothing of the first;
- the second person possesses a different personality;
- the second person has different parents and relationships;
- the second person bears no conscious responsibility for the first
person’s actions;
- and neither person can recognise the alleged continuity.
What, then, has actually returned?
The report’s answer appears to be: the
spirit-form.
But that does not automatically mean that the
same person returned.
At most, the passage proposes continuity of an
underlying spiritual component while allowing each human personality to be new.
That is a metaphysical claim about a recurring
spirit-form. It is not demonstrated personal resurrection, personal survival,
or the repeated return of an identifiable human individual.
This distinction is similar to the broader
problem examined in When Belief Is Disguised as Knowledge: a technical label may sound
explanatory while leaving the actual mechanism unverified.
IV. What
Does “Animate Human Beings” Mean?
The supplied translation says that the
spirit-forms “animate human beings.”
This wording must be handled carefully.
It may be intended to mean that a spirit-form
gives spiritual life or serves as the nonmaterial component associated with a
human being.
It should not automatically be interpreted as:
- possession;
- control by a former personality;
- conscious occupation by an ancient Plejaren person;
- or the survival of an entire previous individual inside a present
human.
The passage does not define “animate” with
sufficient precision.
Therefore, the responsible formulation is:
Contact Report 707 Part 2 claims that certain
ancestral spirit-forms repeatedly become associated with new Earth-human lives.
It does not clearly demonstrate that the previous personalities consciously
inhabit or control those later humans.
Anything stronger would exceed what the
passage itself establishes.
V. The
1,049 Transformations Are Not 1,049 Reincarnations
The report also says that higher
Creation-forms develop through 1,049 transformations toward
progressively higher levels and eventual integration with the Absolute
Absolutum.
This is a separate cosmological claim.
The distinction can be stated plainly:
|
Reincarnation Claim |
1,049 Transformations Claim |
|
Concerns alleged spirit-forms |
Concerns Creation or Creation-universes |
|
Occurs through successive human lives |
Occurs through alleged cosmic developmental stages |
|
Involves birth and death |
Involves transformation of Creation-forms |
|
Number of reincarnations is not specified |
Exactly 1,049 transformations are claimed |
|
Does not describe the same personality returning |
Does not concern human personalities at all |
|
Allegedly relates to Earth-human development |
Allegedly leads toward higher Creation levels and the Absolutum |
Therefore:
The report does not teach that one human being
must experience 1,049 reincarnations.
It teaches two different processes:
Many alleged reincarnations of spirit-forms
and
1,049 alleged transformations of Creation.
Combining them would misrepresent the report.
VI. Does
the Passage Teach the Return of the Same Person?
Not clearly.
The passage teaches that spirit-forms are
reborn and animate later humans. It does not show that the earlier personality,
memories, or self-conscious identity return.
This produces an identity problem.
If Ricardo dies and an alleged spirit-form
later animates another human with:
- another name,
- another family,
- another consciousness,
- another memory,
- another personality,
- and no awareness of being Ricardo,
calling the second person “Ricardo reborn”
would require more evidence than the continuity of an invisible spirit-form.
The spirit-form may be claimed to continue,
but the continuity of the person has not been established.
A container, energy, principle, or spiritual
component is not automatically identical with the complete person associated
with it.
The article Development vs Evolution further examines why
a continuing process should not be confused with the continuing identity of
everything that participates in that process.
VII. Is
Reincarnation Presented as Information or Knowledge?
Within the report, reincarnation is stated as
fact.
For readers outside the alleged contact
relationship, however, it reaches them through testimony:
Alleged higher source → Billy Meier →
translated contact report → reader
The reader is not given direct access to:
- the alleged Plejaren source;
- the ancestral spirit-forms;
- their former embodiments;
- their current embodiments;
- the process between death and rebirth;
- or an instrument capable of detecting the alleged transfer.
Therefore, the claim may accurately be
classified as reported information.
It has not been demonstrated to the reader as
independently established knowledge.
The distinction is not insulting. It is
necessary.
Information is something communicated.
Knowledge is something adequately established
as true.
A statement does not cross from one category
to the other merely because the speaker expresses certainty.
VIII. The
Burden of Proof
The report places the extraordinary claim
before humanity. Therefore, the burden of proof belongs to the claim.
The public should not be required to disprove
invisible reincarnating spirit-forms that cannot be detected, identified, or
measured.
The teaching must provide a reliable way to
distinguish between:
- a genuine reincarnating spirit-form;
- an ordinary human life with no such history;
- mistaken interpretation;
- imagination;
- psychological projection;
- inherited cultural belief;
- and deliberate fabrication.
Without such a method, every claimed
reincarnation can be protected from examination.
That would make the proposition unfalsifiable.
A claim that cannot be tested may still be
contemplated philosophically, but it cannot responsibly be proclaimed as
publicly verified fact.
IX. What
Evidence Would Be Required?
A serious investigation would require more
than declarations from the same authority system.
At minimum, it would need:
1.
Operational definition
What exactly is a spirit-form?
What properties distinguish it from
consciousness, personality, soul, energy, or biological life?
2.
Detection method
How can a spirit-form be detected before
death, after death, or in a later human?
3. Identity
criterion
What establishes that the spirit-form in
Person B is the same one allegedly present in Person A?
4.
Independent confirmation
Can investigators unaffiliated with Billy
Meier, FIGU, or the Plejaren narrative obtain the same results?
5.
Falsification condition
What finding would prove that a claimed
reincarnation did not occur?
6.
Predictive capacity
Can the teaching identify a reincarnation
before personal information is known rather than interpreting it afterward?
7.
Protection against circular reasoning
The contact report cannot be the sole evidence
for the reincarnation claim while the reincarnation claim is simultaneously
used to validate the contact report’s authority.
Until such requirements are satisfied,
suspension of acceptance is the responsible position.
Suspension of acceptance does not mean
automatic denial.
It means the evidence has not yet carried the
weight of the claim.
X.
Examination Under the Seven Pillars
1. TRUTH
The report clearly communicates that
spirit-forms allegedly reincarnate. However, it supplies no independently
verifiable evidence that this occurs.
Assessment: Weak alignment
The claim is stated as truth but has not been
measured as truth.
2. LIGHT
The passage distinguishes spirit-forms from
living humans only imperfectly. It does not clearly define personality
continuity, memory continuity, or what “animate” means.
Assessment: Partial but insufficient alignment
Some information is given, but the most
important identity questions remain unclear.
3. LOVE
The Plejaren’s alleged intention is described
as helping the development of Earth humans. That stated purpose is benevolent.
However, genuine love does not require people
to surrender examination or accept unverifiable claims out of loyalty.
Assessment: Partial alignment in stated
intention
Benevolent intention does not establish
factual truth.
4. POWER
The claim attributes extraordinary power to
spirit-forms and to the alleged order governing death and rebirth.
No mechanism or demonstration of that power is
supplied.
Assessment: Weak alignment
Power is asserted but not publicly shown.
5. CREATION
The claim attempts to place human life within
a larger cosmological process.
Yet it does not demonstrate that repeated
embodiment is an actual law of Creation rather than a teaching about Creation.
Assessment: Unestablished alignment
A claim about Creation must not be confused
with a demonstrated Creational law.
6. WISDOM
Wisdom requires distinguishing what is known,
what is inferred, what is believed, and what depends upon testimony.
Presenting an inaccessible metaphysical claim
as settled knowledge exceeds the available evidence.
Assessment: Weak to partial alignment
The claim may encourage reflection, but its
certainty is not proportionate to its evidence.
7. LIFE
The claim directly concerns life, death, and
continuity.
Nevertheless, it leaves unresolved whether the
same life, person, consciousness, or only an impersonal spirit-form continues.
Assessment: Weak alignment
It proposes continuity without adequately
establishing what kind of continuity exists.
XI.
Provisional Seven-Pillar Score
|
Pillar |
Score |
|
Truth |
2.0/10 |
|
Light |
3.0/10 |
|
Love |
4.5/10 |
|
Power |
2.0/10 |
|
Creation |
2.5/10 |
|
Wisdom |
2.5/10 |
|
Life |
2.5/10 |
|
Overall Alignment |
2.7/10 |
This score does not prove that reincarnation
is impossible.
It measures how adequately this particular
passage establishes its claim.
The principal weakness is not that the claim
is extraordinary. The principal weakness is that the report supplies no
independent method for determining whether it corresponds with reality.
For the broader methodological foundation, see
Why DSPES Does NotBelong to a Religious Framework
XII.
Corrected DSPES Formulation
The claim should be presented in the following
form:
Contact Report 707 Part 2 claims that
spirit-forms associated with certain ancient Plejaren ancestors who allegedly
lived and died on Earth continue to be reborn through many later Earth-human
lives. The passage does not demonstrate that the former personalities,
memories, consciousness, or complete personal identities return. It speaks
primarily of continuity of a spirit-form rather than verified continuity of the
same human person.
This reincarnation claim is separate from the
report’s claim that Creation passes through 1,049 transformations. The number
1,049 refers to alleged cosmic evolutionary stages, not to a required number of
human rebirths.
Because the report supplies no independent
method for detecting spirit-forms, identifying successive embodiments, or
testing the alleged continuity, the reincarnation proposition must remain
classified as an unverified metaphysical claim rather than established
knowledge.
10.
Q&A
1. Does
Contact Report 707 say that one person lives 1,049 human lives?
No. The number 1,049 concerns alleged
transformations of Creation, not human reincarnations.
2. What
does the report say is reincarnated?
It says that the spirit-forms of certain early
ancestors are reborn through many reincarnations and animate later Earth
humans.
3. Does it
say that the same personality returns?
Not in the supplied passage. It does not
clearly say that the previous personality, memories, character, or conscious
identity return.
4. Does
“animate” mean possession?
The passage does not define the term
sufficiently. It should not automatically be interpreted as possession or
control by a former personality.
5. Can the
reincarnated individuals be independently identified?
The report supplies no public method for
identifying them or tracing a spirit-form between successive lives.
6. Does
DSPES declare reincarnation impossible?
This examination does not claim to prove
impossibility. It concludes that Contact Report 707 Part 2 does not provide
sufficient evidence to establish reincarnation as verified knowledge.
7. What is
the most accurate conclusion?
The report teaches repeated spirit-form
embodiment as a cosmological claim. It does not demonstrate the repeated return
of the same identifiable human person, and it does not connect reincarnation
with the 1,049 transformations of Creation.
11.
CONCLUSION
The reincarnation confusion in Contact Report
707 Part 2 can be resolved only by preserving the report’s own distinctions.
The report makes one claim about spirit-forms
allegedly reborn through many human lives.
It makes another claim about Creation
allegedly passing through 1,049 transformations.
They are not the same process.
The report does not say that one human
personality undergoes exactly 1,049 reincarnations. Neither does it establish
that an ancient person returns with the same memory, consciousness, character,
and identity.
What allegedly continues is the spirit-form.
What remains unexplained is whether continuity
of a spirit-form constitutes continuity of the same person.
That question cannot be answered merely by
repeating the word “reincarnation.”
A label is not a mechanism.
A mechanism is not evidence merely because it
has been described.
An extraordinary statement may be respected as
information while still being withheld from the category of established
knowledge.
Human beings deserve clarity. They should not
be asked to accept a doctrine concerning life, death, and personal identity
while its central terms remain undefined and its process remains inaccessible
to independent examination.
The responsible judgment is therefore firm but
fair:
Contact Report 707 Part 2 claims repeated
rebirth of ancestral spirit-forms, not the repeated return of the same
demonstrated personality and not 1,049 human reincarnations. Because no
independent evidence or verification method is supplied, the claim does not
presently achieve sufficient alignment with the Seven Pillars to be accepted as
established reality.
______________________________________________________________________________
A Final
Question for Every Reader to Contemplate
If, under this reincarnation model, the
personality, personal consciousness, memories, relationships, struggles, and
consciously acquired knowledge of Person A do not continue into the life of
Person B, then does the spirit-form merely use Person A as a temporary
instrument for its own evolution?
Person A spends an entire lifetime studying,
suffering, learning, correcting mistakes, developing wisdom, forming
relationships, and striving toward a higher purpose. Yet when Person A dies,
Person B is allegedly born without Person A’s personality, without Person A’s
personal consciousness, without Person A’s memories, and without conscious
possession of the knowledge Person A worked so hard to acquire.
Only the spirit-form is said to continue.
But Person A performed the labour. Person A
endured the suffering. Person A made the sacrifices. Person A acquired the
knowledge. If Person A no longer exists as the conscious individual who can
remember, possess, apply, or continue what was gained, then for whose
development was that entire lifetime lived?
Can it meaningfully be said that Person A
evolved if Person A disappears, while only an unidentified spirit-form carries
forward an alleged result that Person B cannot consciously remember?
And if Person B must begin with another
personality, another consciousness, another personal history, and no knowledge
of Person A’s life, in what meaningful sense does Person B continue the
unfinished purpose of Person A?
If the conscious worker disappears, the
memories disappear, and the acquired knowledge is no longer personally
possessed, does this system truly preserve the purpose and continuity of human
life—or does it reduce every human personality to a temporary tool used for the
evolution of something else?
This is the question every reader must
contemplate: Who truly benefits from a lifetime of struggle and learning—the
person who consciously lived it, or only the spirit-form that allegedly
continues after that person is gone?
12.
SIGNATURE CLOSING PARAGRAPH
The Doctrine of the Seven Pillars of the
Eternal Source does not forbid the examination of extraordinary possibilities.
It forbids us from calling an extraordinary possibility established truth
before reality has carried its weight. Truth must remain measurable, Light must
clarify rather than confuse, Love must respect human freedom, Power must be
responsibly demonstrated, Creation must not be defined by assertion, Wisdom
must distinguish testimony from knowledge, and Life must never be reduced to an
unexplained mechanism.
Truth is measured, not invented. Reality is
discovered, not created by the authority of a claim.
A Final
Question for Every Reader to Contemplate
If, under this reincarnation model, the
personality, personal consciousness, memories, relationships, struggles, and
consciously acquired knowledge of Person A do not continue into the life of
Person B, then does the spirit-form merely use Person A as a temporary
instrument for its own evolution?
Person A spends an entire lifetime studying,
suffering, learning, correcting mistakes, developing wisdom, forming
relationships, and striving toward a higher purpose. Yet when Person A dies,
Person B is allegedly born without Person A’s personality, without Person A’s
personal consciousness, without Person A’s memories, and without conscious
possession of the knowledge Person A worked so hard to acquire.
Only the spirit-form is said to continue.
But Person A performed the labour. Person A
endured the suffering. Person A made the sacrifices. Person A acquired the
knowledge. If Person A no longer exists as the conscious individual who can
remember, possess, apply, or continue what was gained, then for whose
development was that entire lifetime lived?
Can it meaningfully be said that Person A
evolved if Person A disappears, while only an unidentified spirit-form carries
forward an alleged result that Person B cannot consciously remember?
And if Person B must begin with another
personality, another consciousness, another personal history, and no knowledge
of Person A’s life, in what meaningful sense does Person B continue the
unfinished purpose of Person A?
If the conscious worker disappears, the
memories disappear, and the acquired knowledge is no longer personally
possessed, does this system truly preserve the purpose and continuity of human
life—or does it reduce every human personality to a temporary tool used for the
evolution of something else?
This is the question every reader must
contemplate: Who truly benefits from a lifetime of struggle and learning—the
person who consciously lived it, or only the spirit-form that allegedly
continues after that person is gone?
13. CALL
TO ACTION
Read the claim carefully. Separate spirit-form
continuity from personal identity. Separate human reincarnation from cosmic
transformation. Then ask the question every serious teaching must face:
What evidence would allow an independent
person to know that this claim is true—and what evidence would show that it is
mistaken?
Share this examination with readers who may be
confusing the 1,049 transformations of Creation with repeated human
reincarnation.
14. READ
THIS ARTICLE IN THE OTHER LANGUAGE
Basahin sa Tagalog: Reinkarnasyon o Kosmikong
Pagbabagong-Anyo?
15.
RELATED ARTICLES
- Comprehensive DSPES Examination of Contact Report 707
- When Belief Is Disguised as Knowledge
- Development vs Evolution
- Why DSPES Does Not Belong to a Religious Framework
16.
BLOGGER LABELS / SEO TAGS
DSPES, Contact Report 707, reincarnation,
spirit-form, Billy Meier, Plejaren, 1,049 transformations, personal identity,
evidence, Seven Pillars
17.
HASHTAGS
#DSPES #ContactReport707 #Reincarnation
#SpiritForm #BillyMeier #Plejaren #PersonalIdentity #Truth #Evidence
#SevenPillars
No comments:
Post a Comment