“Returning to the man behind the tradition and the testimony behind belief.”
What if understanding Jesus requires setting aside centuries of assumptions and listening again to the voices of those who actually knew him?
A biblical examination of the historical Jesus that exposes how Paul’s Damascus vision distorted the eyewitness teachings of Christ.
Modern Christianity often assumes that the Jesus preached by Paul is identical to the Jesus taught by the original witnesses. This assumption is rarely tested—but when examined carefully, it collapses.
The historical Jesus taught publicly, walked with disciples, and was known personally by those who recorded his words.
This article argues a simple but uncomfortable truth:
Paul’s “Jesus of Damascus” represents a theological distortion of the historical Jesus taught by eyewitnesses.
Paul, by contrast, claimed authority through a private vision on the road to Damascus—without eyewitness confirmation, without shared ministry, and without accountability to those who knew Jesus in the flesh.
Bago magpatuloy, simulan muna sa pag-aaral na ito:
👉 Christology ng Jesus ng Nazaret — Basahing Pundasyon
Modern Christianity often assumes that the Jesus preached by Paul is identical to the Jesus taught by the original witnesses. This assumption is rarely tested—but when examined carefully, it collapses.
The historical Jesus taught publicly, walked with disciples, and was known personally by those who recorded his words.
This article argues a simple but uncomfortable truth:
Paul’s “Jesus of Damascus” represents a theological distortion of the historical Jesus taught by eyewitnesses.
Bago magpatuloy, simulan muna sa pag-aaral na ito:
👉 Christology ng Jesus ng Nazaret — Basahing Pundasyon